Publishing Principles and Editorial Guidelines

As part of our editorial policy, we accept contributions that are both original and not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. It is critical for all authors to provide work that is informed by their own research and written in their own terms. We have created these rules as part of our Copyright Policy to help authors distinguish between proper and improper behavior. Our strategy focuses especially on promoting and safeguarding authors' creative output. An vital component in the growth of a well-organized and reputable network of knowledge is the publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal. It is a clear indication of the author's and publisher's level of productivity. Articles that have undergone peer review uphold and represent science. As a result, it's critical to establish consensus on moral expectations.

• The reported study's authors should only be those who made a major contribution to its idea, design, implementation, or interpretation.

• The authors must make sure that their writing is fully unique, and if they have borrowed ideas or words from others, they must properly credit or quote them. Plagiarism-free writing is essential.

• The raw data associated with an article must be provided by the authors for editorial review, and they must be willing to make the data available to the public.

• In general, authors shouldn't publish papers that essentially describe the same research in more than one journal greater than one journal or major publication. Expression Journal do not consider the following to be earlier publications of a work: publishing as an academic thesis, publication as an abstract, or publication as an electronic preprint.

• The right acknowledgement.

• Disclosure of all relationships that might be construed as creating a possible conflict of interest is required for all submissions.

• It is the responsibility of the author to contact the journal editor or publisher as soon as he or she becomes aware of a substantial error or inaccuracy in their own published work and to work with the editor to have the paper retracted or corrected.

• Authors of reports on original research should give a truthful assessment of the work done and an unbiased analysis of its relevance.

• Statements of compliance are necessary if the work uses drugs, techniques, or tools that have any unusual risks inherent in their use, as well as if it uses human or animal subjects.