Instructions

Submission Guidance for Literary Musings

Thank you for considering submitting your work to Literary Musings. We are a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes original and high-quality literature-related research articles, book reviews, and creative writing pieces. To ensure that the submission and publication process are smooth and ethical, please review the submission guidelines carefully.

Style and Format:

• All submissions should be written in MLA 9th Edition style.

• Abstract ought to be 200- 250 words.

• Articles should be between 2,000 to 4,000 words in length; book reviews should be between 1,000 to 1,500 words, and creative writing pieces should be no more than 2,000 words in length.

• Submissions should be double-spaced, standard 12-point font, and use one-inch margins on all sides.

• We accept Microsoft Word (doc or .docx) format only.

• Ensure that the submission does not contain any identifying details that may jeopardize the anonymity of the submissions in the review process.

Submission Guidelines:

• You can submit your work via email as an attachment to the Editor at literarymusings@literarymusings.com or literarymusings@gmail.com

• Submit a cover letter in the email body, including the submission title, author name, affiliation, and a brief biographical statement.

• The submission must include an abstract of no more than 250 words and 6 to 8 keywords with corresponding mail and ORCiD.

• The submission must be original work, free from plagiarism, and not submitted elsewhere for publication.

• Include a Works Cited or a Bibliography page following MLA 9 norms.

Peer-Review and Publication Process:

• All submissions are subject to a double-blind peer-review process before final acceptance or rejection.

• We follow the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines for publication ethics to ensure ethical standards in publication.

• We aim to make the publication process as timely as possible. However, publication schedules may vary depending on the workload of the editorial team and external factors.

Copyright and Liability:

• The author remains the copyright holder of their work. However, Literary Musings reserves the right to publish the work in print and electronic formats.

• The author accepts full responsibility for any copyrighted material used in the submission, including text, images, or multimedia files.

• The author acknowledges that Literary Musings does not hold any responsibility for any errors or inaccuracies found in the submission.

Thank you for submitting your work to Literary Musings.

Ethics and Malpractice Statement for the Journal "Literary Musings"

At Literary Musings, we are committed to upholding the highest ethical standards in everything we do. We follow the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines on publication ethics and work diligently to prevent malpractice, misconduct, and plagiarism.

The editorial team at Literary Musings ensures that all submitted manuscripts are thoroughly and fairly reviewed by competent and independent experts in the relevant field. We give authors the opportunity to respond to reviewers' comments and to improve their work whenever possible. All submissions to the journal are subject to rigorous editorial standards, and we strive to maintain confidentiality and privacy of authors at all times.

Our policy on plagiarism is strict and uncompromising. We use advanced plagiarism detection software to ensure that all manuscripts are original and have not previously been published or submitted elsewhere. We do not tolerate any form of academic misconduct, including plagiarism, and will take appropriate action if such behavior is detected.

In the event that any misconduct is detected, we will investigate the issue thoroughly and take appropriate action, including retracting the article and banning future submissions from the offending author or institution.

Overall, our ethical and malpractice policies are meant to ensure that the research published in Literary Musings is of the highest quality and that our readers can trust the information presented in our pages. We are dedicated to maintaining the strictest ethical and professional standards in order to advance the field of literary studies and contribute to the broader knowledge base in the humanities.

Anti-plagiarism Statement

At "Literary Musings," we maintain high standards of academic integrity and ethical publishing practices. We are committed to ensuring that all work published in our journal adheres to the guidelines set out by the Modern Language Association (MLA), 9th edition, and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

We strictly prohibit plagiarism in any form, including the use of another author's work without proper attribution, paraphrasing or summarizing without appropriate citation, and reusing one's own previously published work without transparency or acknowledgement. We also do not accept submissions that incorporate data, figures, or ideas from other sources without proper citation and permission.

Any allegations of plagiarism are taken seriously and will be investigated thoroughly. Authors found guilty of plagiarism will be informed and will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action, which may include rejection of the submission, retraction of the published article, and a ban on future submissions.

At "Literary Musings," we believe that academic integrity is vital to the advancement of scholarship and the development of knowledge. We are committed to upholding these values and promoting ethical publishing practices in all aspects of our journal. All papers will be screened with Crossref Similarity Check.

Open Access Statement

Literary Musings is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that values the advancement of knowledge and the democratization of information. As such, we believe that open access is a fundamental part of academic publishing and that it is essential for our readers to have free access to our content.

As an open access journal, all of our articles are freely available to read, download and share without any subscription fees or costs. This means that our content is accessible to both researchers and enthusiasts around the world, regardless of their socioeconomic status.

We adhere to the guidelines set forth by international standards for open access publishing, including the Budapest Open Access Initiative, the Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities, and the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing.

We are committed to providing open access to our readers, and we strive to continually improve our publication process to support this mission. Our authors retain copyright of their work and are encouraged to publish their articles under a Creative Commons license, which allows for unlimited use, distribution, and reproduction, provided proper attribution is given.

We strongly support the principles of open access, which include promoting the free flow of information and knowledge, increasing the visibility and impact of research, and enabling equitable access to resources for all individuals regardless of location or institutional affiliation.

We welcome contributions from researchers and scholars around the world, and we encourage them to submit their work for publication in Literary Musings. Our editorial team is committed to transparent and rigorous peer review, and we are dedicated to working with our authors to produce high-quality, open access scholarship.

We invite you to explore our open access content and to engage with us in ongoing conversations about the importance of open access publishing in advancing knowledge and promoting global access to information.

Content Licensing Statement:

Literary Musings, a journal dedicated to exploring and showcasing the creative expressions of writers and artists, adopts the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License to encourage the dissemination and sharing of content with the public.

This license permits anyone to copy, distribute, and adapt works from Literary Musings in any medium and format, subject to certain conditions. The conditions include attribution to the author or creator, noting any changes made, indicating the source of the material, and using it strictly for non-commercial purposes.

By publishing your work in Literary Musings, you agree to the terms and conditions set forth by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You retain the copyright to your work but grant Literary Musings the right to publish and distribute your work in all mediums without further permission or compensation.

We believe that this license will benefit our contributors by allowing their work to reach a wider audience and facilitating the sharing of ideas and perspectives. Moreover, we hope that Literary Musings will be a platform for fostering collaboration, creative expression, and community engagement.

If you have any questions or concerns about the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, please don't hesitate to contact us. We appreciate your valuable contribution to Literary Musings and look forward to sharing your work with the world.

Frequency Statement

"Literary Musings" is a bi-yearly publication that is committed to disseminating high-quality scholarship on literature and related fields. Under the Diamond Open Access Policy, the journal aims to make all of its content freely available to all readers without any fees (No APC) or restrictions.

The publication schedule for "Literary Musings" follows a bi-yearly frequency, releasing new issues in January and July. The January issue covers the topics of the previous year's second semester, while the July issue includes research and reviews from the first semester of the current year. Each issue contains peer-reviewed articles, book reviews, and interviews with scholars and writers working in the literary field.

In addition to regular issues, "Literary Musings" also publishes special issues that focus on particular themes, genres, or cultural contexts. These special issues are usually guest-edited by experts in the field, and they provide an opportunity for in-depth exploration and discussion of emerging or underrepresented topics in literary studies.

We welcome submissions of original and innovative research from scholars, graduate students, and independent researchers in all areas of literature and the humanities. Our editorial policy is to provide constructive and rigorous feedback to authors, working collaboratively to produce high-quality publications that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of literary studies.

Thank you for your interest in "Literary Musings"! We look forward to sharing with you the latest advancements in literary scholarship and fostering productive conversations about the value and significance of literary works and their impact on society.

Peer Review Policy

The journal Literary Musings is dedicated to publishing original research and critical essays on various aspects of literature. As a reputable scholarly publication, the journal is committed to a rigorous, robust, and transparent peer review process to ensure the high quality of the articles published in the journal. One of the most effective and reliable methods of peer review is double-blind peer review. Therefore, the journal has established the following policy for double-blind peer review.

1. Overview:

Double-blind peer review is a method of reviewing scholarly articles, in which the identities of both the author(s) and the reviewers are kept anonymous from each other. This helps to avoid any implicit biases or prejudices that might arise if the identities were known. In double-blind peer review, the manuscript is assigned to two anonymous reviewers, who are experts in the field of study covered by the manuscript. Each reviewer is expected to provide a comprehensive and constructive feedback on the manuscript that ultimately helps the editor in making an informed decision about the manuscript.

2. Selection of Reviewers:

The reviewers for each manuscript are selected based on their expertise and experience in the relevant field of study. The editor-in-chief is responsible for the selection of the reviewers. They evaluate the potential reviewers based on their previous publications, experience, and knowledge in the field. They ensure that the reviewers are not affiliated with the author(s) or their institution. Finally, they reach out to the selected reviewers and seek their consent to review the manuscript.

3. Structure of the Review:

The reviewers are requested to submit a detailed report on the manuscript using a standardized template provided by the journal. The review should consist of the following components:

• A general summary of the manuscript's key findings and arguments.

• An evaluation of the manuscript's originality, significance, and contribution to the field of study.

• A critique of the manuscript's methodology, data, analysis, and interpretation.

• Detailed comments on the manuscript's structure, organization, and language, including suggestions for improvement.

4. Timeframe:

The journal ensures that the double-blind peer review process is conducted promptly, yet thoroughly, to minimize the time taken for an article to be published. Typically, the review process takes around 6-8 weeks from the initial submission of a manuscript to the final decision. The author(s) are informed about the status of their manuscript through regular updates from the editor-in-chief.

5. Decision-making:

The journal uses a standardized decision-making process that is based on the feedback provided by the reviewers. After receiving the reviews, the editor-in-chief evaluates the manuscript and the reviewers' comments. They make a decision whether to accept, reject, or request revisions to the manuscript. The author(s) will be notified of the decision along with accompanying comments and recommendations from the reviewers.

6. Anonymity and Confidentiality:

The double-blind peer review process aims to ensure anonymity and confidentiality of the manuscript and the reviewers at all times. All communications between the editor-in-chief, the reviewers, and the author(s) are kept confidential. Furthermore, the journal policies prohibit reviewers from sharing the manuscript or any information about the manuscript with others, without the permission of the editor-in-chief.

7. Ethical Considerations

The journal is committed to upholding the ethical standards in research and publication. The double-blind peer review process ensures the integrity of the content published in the journal by avoiding any potential conflicts of interest. The reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and adhere to the journal's ethical standards.

In general, the double-blind peer review process is an effective and reliable way to ensure high standards of quality, rigor, and transparency in scholarly publishing. It helps the journal to publish original research and critical essays of the highest caliber. The journal's policy on double-blind peer review helps to maintain confidentiality and integrity while providing constructive feedback on the manuscripts.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The editorial board of "Literary Musings" is committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards in all aspects of our publication process. As such, we adhere to the principles and guidelines outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

To minimize the potential for conflicts of interest, all members of our editorial team, including editors, reviewers, and authors, are required to disclose any financial or personal relationships that may influence their work. This includes, but is not limited to, funding sources, affiliations with organizations or institutions, and personal relationships.

In the event that a conflict of interest is identified, the editorial board will take appropriate action to address the situation, which may include reassigning editorial responsibilities, seeking alternative reviewers, or delaying publication.

We believe that transparency and ethical conduct are essential to the integrity of our publication, and we are committed to upholding these values in every aspect of our work.

Publication Ethics for Authors, Reviewers and Editors

1. For Authors:

• All submitted works must be original and not previously published or under review elsewhere.

• Ensure that all data and sources used in the article are properly cited and acknowledged.

• Avoid plagiarism, fabrication, or falsification of research data.

• Describe the research methodology and provide accurate and verifiable results.

• Disclose any potential conflicts of interest or funding sources that might influence the study's outcome.

• Obtain permission from any material or content, including images or media, used in the article.

2. For Reviewers:

• Conduct an impartial and critical analysis of the manuscript, focusing on the quality and validity of the research.

• Ensure confidentiality and refrain from disclosing or using the manuscript for personal gain.

• Disclose any potential conflicts of interest or relationship with the author(s) or institution(s).

• Provide constructive and timely feedback to improve the manuscript's clarity and presentation.

• Alert the editor if any inaccuracies, ethical or legal issues, or copyright infringement concerns are found.

3. For Editors:

• Appoint independent and expert reviewers who have the necessary knowledge and experience to evaluate the manuscript.

• Ensure confidentiality and anonymity of the peer-review process, and only share the manuscript with relevant parties.

• Establish and maintain clear and transparent communication with authors and reviewers through editorial policies and guidelines.

• Address any potential ethical concerns or violations in a consistent and fair manner.

• Make editorial decisions based on the quality and relevance of the manuscript, not the author's reputation, credentials, or personal beliefs.

Steps against misconduct for Editors and Reviewers

1. Clearly define and communicate expectations for ethical conduct to all staff members, including editors, reviewers, authors, and publishers.

2. Implement a code of conduct or ethics policy for everyone involved in the publication process of Literary Musings, which includes expectations for the types of conduct that are considered unacceptable.

3. Establish a process for dealing with allegations of misconduct, such as plagiarism, falsification of data, or unethical behavior.

4. Develop a system for safely storing research data, manuscripts, and bibliographic references - ensuring data protection measures are in place to prevent data breaches that could compromise the authenticity or accuracy of published research.

5. Create a process for addressing authorship issues, such as disputes, incorrect or incomplete author affiliations, and author misrepresentations.

6. Ensure that all publication decisions of Literary Musings are transparent, objective, and unbiased - this means taking extra care to avoid conflicts of interest.

7. Set up a mechanism for reviewers and authors to raise concerns of potential misconduct without fearing retribution, to ensure that all cases of misconduct are addressed as they emerge.

8. Investigate all allegations of misconduct swiftly, conducting a rigorous investigation process that follows best practice and COPE ethical guidelines - this may involve interviews with relevant parties, comparing content, data or bibliographic references to pre-existing evidence, rechecking relevant data or conducting a forensic analysis of suspect materials.

9. When misconduct is determined, take appropriate actions that are consistent with the severity of the case. This may include retraction, correction, or revision of published materials, cancelling published publications, investigations into sources of misconduct, or removing members who engage in misconduct from the editorial board/local committee.

10. Provide support and resources to all members of the publication to ensure they feel confident to report emerging misconduct, and are aware of best ethical practice. Provide relevant training opportunities so everyone knows how to identify and respond to cases of misconduct, verifying data and validating research.

Article submission check list

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) is an organization providing guidelines and standard practices for academic publications. It aims to promote ethical conduct in publishing research and scientific literature. Journal editors adhere to COPE's best practices to ensure high-quality publications and avoid issues of plagiarism and misconduct.

If you are submitting an article to the academic journal "Literary Musings," here is a checklist that you should follow, taking guidance from the COPE ethics committee:

1. Originality of work: Ensure that the work you intend to submit is original and has not been published elsewhere, nor is it under consideration by another journal. Submitting duplicate work is unethical and can lead to serious repercussions.

2. Authorship: All authors who have made a significant contribution to the research must be listed as authors, and those who have not contributed substantially should not be listed as authors. Also, prior to submission, ensure that all authors have agreed to the publication and have provided their consent.

3. Plagiarism and Citation: Ensure that the work is free from any form of plagiarism. Give appropriate credit through citations to the original sources used to build upon the work, which helps to avoid issues of misconduct.

4. Abstract: Provide a concise and clear abstract that highlights the key findings and significance of the research.

5. Methodology: Provide a detailed and complete description of the research methodology. This aids in the reproduction or replication of the study by other scholars for purposes of verification or critique.

6. Figures and Tables: Ensure that all figures and tables are appropriately cited or referenced in the main text with proper legends and captions. They must be of adequate resolution and quality and free from any errors.

7. Ethical Considerations: Ethical considerations must be appropriately considered, especially for research involving human subjects or animals.

8. Acknowledgment: Provide appropriate acknowledgment to funders or contributors who have aided in the research work.

9. Conclusion and Implications: Clearly mention the conclusions and implications of the research. Also, highlight the potential applications and limitations of the findings.

10. Compliance with Journal Guidelines: Ensure that the submission complies with "Literary Musings" journal guidelines and format requirements. Failure to adhere to these guidelines may lead to a rejection of the submission.

In conclusion, following this COPE-guided checklist can help to enhance the quality of research submitted to journals like Literary Musings. It is essential to remember that ethical publishing practices are critical to maintaining the integrity, transparency, and credibility of academic literature.

Indexing and Abstracting and Preservation of Contents

"Literary Musings" is a scholarly journal that publishes articles and research in the field of literature. As an indexing and abstracting statement for this journal, we could say that each issue of "Literary Musings" includes a wide range of articles on various literary topics. The journal covers literature from different time periods and genres, including poetry, fiction, and drama.

To ensure that readers can easily find relevant articles, each issue of "Literary Musings" is carefully indexed using a range of relevant terms and concepts. This indexing helps readers quickly locate articles on specific topics or authors.

Additionally, each article in "Literary Musings" includes a concise and informative abstract. These abstracts summarize the key points of the article and give readers a sense of its content and scope. This makes it easier for readers to determine if an article is relevant to their research or interests.

Overall, "Literary Musings" is a valuable resource for scholars and students of literature. Its careful indexing and informative abstracts make it easy to find and access relevant articles on a wide range of literary topics.

Indexing: Google Scholar, Internet Archive, ISSN, ROAD, MLA, etc.

Content Registration in Crossref and Preservation in Internet Archive

We are proud to announce that all of our journal articles are registered with a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) with Crossref. This means that each article is assigned a unique and permanent identifier that makes it easy to locate and cite. The DOI also ensures that our articles are discoverable and accessible online for the long-term.

In addition to DOI registration, our journal articles are also preserved for long-term access, preservation and availability through the Internet Archive. This is a digital library that provides free access to millions of books, websites, and other resources. By preserving our articles in the Internet Archive, we are ensuring that they are available for future generations of scholars and researchers.

Overall, our commitment to Crossref DOI registration and long-term preservation through the Internet Archive reflects our dedication to providing high-quality, accessible, and enduring scholarly content. We believe that these measures will help to ensure the long-term viability and impact of our journal.

Submission Guidance for Literary Musings

Thank you for considering submitting your work to Literary Musings. We are a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes original and high-quality literature-related research articles, book reviews, and creative writing pieces. To ensure that the submission and publication process are smooth and ethical, please review the submission guidelines carefully.

Style and Format:

• All submissions should be written in MLA 9th Edition style.

• Abstract ought to be 200- 250 words.

• Articles should be between 2,000 to 4,000 words in length; book reviews should be between 1,000 to 1,500 words, and creative writing pieces should be no more than 2,000 words in length.

• Submissions should be double-spaced, standard 12-point font, and use one-inch margins on all sides.

• We accept Microsoft Word (doc or .docx) format only.

• Ensure that the submission does not contain any identifying details that may jeopardize the anonymity of the submissions in the review process.

Submission Guidelines:

• You can submit your work via email as an attachment to the Editor at literarymusings@literarymusings.com or literarymusings@gmail.com

• Submit a cover letter in the email body, including the submission title, author name, affiliation, and a brief biographical statement.

• The submission must include an abstract of no more than 250 words and 6 to 8 keywords with corresponding mail and ORCiD.

• The submission must be original work, free from plagiarism, and not submitted elsewhere for publication.

• Include a Works Cited or a Bibliography page following MLA 9 norms.

Peer-Review and Publication Process:

• All submissions are subject to a double-blind peer-review process before final acceptance or rejection.

• We follow the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines for publication ethics to ensure ethical standards in publication.

• We aim to make the publication process as timely as possible. However, publication schedules may vary depending on the workload of the editorial team and external factors.

Copyright and Liability:

• The author remains the copyright holder of their work. However, Literary Musings reserves the right to publish the work in print and electronic formats.

• The author accepts full responsibility for any copyrighted material used in the submission, including text, images, or multimedia files.

• The author acknowledges that Literary Musings does not hold any responsibility for any errors or inaccuracies found in the submission.

Thank you for submitting your work to Literary Musings.

Ethics and Malpractice Statement for the Journal "Literary Musings"

At Literary Musings, we are committed to upholding the highest ethical standards in everything we do. We follow the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines on publication ethics and work diligently to prevent malpractice, misconduct, and plagiarism.

The editorial team at Literary Musings ensures that all submitted manuscripts are thoroughly and fairly reviewed by competent and independent experts in the relevant field. We give authors the opportunity to respond to reviewers' comments and to improve their work whenever possible. All submissions to the journal are subject to rigorous editorial standards, and we strive to maintain confidentiality and privacy of authors at all times.

Our policy on plagiarism is strict and uncompromising. We use advanced plagiarism detection software to ensure that all manuscripts are original and have not previously been published or submitted elsewhere. We do not tolerate any form of academic misconduct, including plagiarism, and will take appropriate action if such behavior is detected.

In the event that any misconduct is detected, we will investigate the issue thoroughly and take appropriate action, including retracting the article and banning future submissions from the offending author or institution.

Overall, our ethical and malpractice policies are meant to ensure that the research published in Literary Musings is of the highest quality and that our readers can trust the information presented in our pages. We are dedicated to maintaining the strictest ethical and professional standards in order to advance the field of literary studies and contribute to the broader knowledge base in the humanities.

Anti-plagiarism Statement

At "Literary Musings," we maintain high standards of academic integrity and ethical publishing practices. We are committed to ensuring that all work published in our journal adheres to the guidelines set out by the Modern Language Association (MLA), 9th edition, and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

We strictly prohibit plagiarism in any form, including the use of another author's work without proper attribution, paraphrasing or summarizing without appropriate citation, and reusing one's own previously published work without transparency or acknowledgement. We also do not accept submissions that incorporate data, figures, or ideas from other sources without proper citation and permission.

Any allegations of plagiarism are taken seriously and will be investigated thoroughly. Authors found guilty of plagiarism will be informed and will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action, which may include rejection of the submission, retraction of the published article, and a ban on future submissions.

At "Literary Musings," we believe that academic integrity is vital to the advancement of scholarship and the development of knowledge. We are committed to upholding these values and promoting ethical publishing practices in all aspects of our journal. All papers will be screened with Crossref Similarity Check.

Open Access Statement

Literary Musings is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that values the advancement of knowledge and the democratization of information. As such, we believe that open access is a fundamental part of academic publishing and that it is essential for our readers to have free access to our content.

As an open access journal, all of our articles are freely available to read, download and share without any subscription fees or costs. This means that our content is accessible to both researchers and enthusiasts around the world, regardless of their socioeconomic status.

We adhere to the guidelines set forth by international standards for open access publishing, including the Budapest Open Access Initiative, the Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities, and the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing.

We are committed to providing open access to our readers, and we strive to continually improve our publication process to support this mission. Our authors retain copyright of their work and are encouraged to publish their articles under a Creative Commons license, which allows for unlimited use, distribution, and reproduction, provided proper attribution is given.

We strongly support the principles of open access, which include promoting the free flow of information and knowledge, increasing the visibility and impact of research, and enabling equitable access to resources for all individuals regardless of location or institutional affiliation.

We welcome contributions from researchers and scholars around the world, and we encourage them to submit their work for publication in Literary Musings. Our editorial team is committed to transparent and rigorous peer review, and we are dedicated to working with our authors to produce high-quality, open access scholarship.

We invite you to explore our open access content and to engage with us in ongoing conversations about the importance of open access publishing in advancing knowledge and promoting global access to information.

Content Licensing Statement:

Literary Musings, a journal dedicated to exploring and showcasing the creative expressions of writers and artists, adopts the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License to encourage the dissemination and sharing of content with the public.

This license permits anyone to copy, distribute, and adapt works from Literary Musings in any medium and format, subject to certain conditions. The conditions include attribution to the author or creator, noting any changes made, indicating the source of the material, and using it strictly for non-commercial purposes.

By publishing your work in Literary Musings, you agree to the terms and conditions set forth by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You retain the copyright to your work but grant Literary Musings the right to publish and distribute your work in all mediums without further permission or compensation.

We believe that this license will benefit our contributors by allowing their work to reach a wider audience and facilitating the sharing of ideas and perspectives. Moreover, we hope that Literary Musings will be a platform for fostering collaboration, creative expression, and community engagement.

If you have any questions or concerns about the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, please don't hesitate to contact us. We appreciate your valuable contribution to Literary Musings and look forward to sharing your work with the world.

Frequency Statement

"Literary Musings" is a bi-yearly publication that is committed to disseminating high-quality scholarship on literature and related fields. Under the Diamond Open Access Policy, the journal aims to make all of its content freely available to all readers without any fees (No APC) or restrictions.

The publication schedule for "Literary Musings" follows a bi-yearly frequency, releasing new issues in January and July. The January issue covers the topics of the previous year's second semester, while the July issue includes research and reviews from the first semester of the current year. Each issue contains peer-reviewed articles, book reviews, and interviews with scholars and writers working in the literary field.

In addition to regular issues, "Literary Musings" also publishes special issues that focus on particular themes, genres, or cultural contexts. These special issues are usually guest-edited by experts in the field, and they provide an opportunity for in-depth exploration and discussion of emerging or underrepresented topics in literary studies.

We welcome submissions of original and innovative research from scholars, graduate students, and independent researchers in all areas of literature and the humanities. Our editorial policy is to provide constructive and rigorous feedback to authors, working collaboratively to produce high-quality publications that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of literary studies.

Thank you for your interest in "Literary Musings"! We look forward to sharing with you the latest advancements in literary scholarship and fostering productive conversations about the value and significance of literary works and their impact on society.

Peer Review Policy

The journal Literary Musings is dedicated to publishing original research and critical essays on various aspects of literature. As a reputable scholarly publication, the journal is committed to a rigorous, robust, and transparent peer review process to ensure the high quality of the articles published in the journal. One of the most effective and reliable methods of peer review is double-blind peer review. Therefore, the journal has established the following policy for double-blind peer review.

1. Overview:

Double-blind peer review is a method of reviewing scholarly articles, in which the identities of both the author(s) and the reviewers are kept anonymous from each other. This helps to avoid any implicit biases or prejudices that might arise if the identities were known. In double-blind peer review, the manuscript is assigned to two anonymous reviewers, who are experts in the field of study covered by the manuscript. Each reviewer is expected to provide a comprehensive and constructive feedback on the manuscript that ultimately helps the editor in making an informed decision about the manuscript.

2. Selection of Reviewers:

The reviewers for each manuscript are selected based on their expertise and experience in the relevant field of study. The editor-in-chief is responsible for the selection of the reviewers. They evaluate the potential reviewers based on their previous publications, experience, and knowledge in the field. They ensure that the reviewers are not affiliated with the author(s) or their institution. Finally, they reach out to the selected reviewers and seek their consent to review the manuscript.

3. Structure of the Review:

The reviewers are requested to submit a detailed report on the manuscript using a standardized template provided by the journal. The review should consist of the following components:

• A general summary of the manuscript's key findings and arguments.

• An evaluation of the manuscript's originality, significance, and contribution to the field of study.

• A critique of the manuscript's methodology, data, analysis, and interpretation.

• Detailed comments on the manuscript's structure, organization, and language, including suggestions for improvement.

4. Timeframe:

The journal ensures that the double-blind peer review process is conducted promptly, yet thoroughly, to minimize the time taken for an article to be published. Typically, the review process takes around 6-8 weeks from the initial submission of a manuscript to the final decision. The author(s) are informed about the status of their manuscript through regular updates from the editor-in-chief.

5. Decision-making:

The journal uses a standardized decision-making process that is based on the feedback provided by the reviewers. After receiving the reviews, the editor-in-chief evaluates the manuscript and the reviewers' comments. They make a decision whether to accept, reject, or request revisions to the manuscript. The author(s) will be notified of the decision along with accompanying comments and recommendations from the reviewers.

6. Anonymity and Confidentiality:

The double-blind peer review process aims to ensure anonymity and confidentiality of the manuscript and the reviewers at all times. All communications between the editor-in-chief, the reviewers, and the author(s) are kept confidential. Furthermore, the journal policies prohibit reviewers from sharing the manuscript or any information about the manuscript with others, without the permission of the editor-in-chief.

7. Ethical Considerations

The journal is committed to upholding the ethical standards in research and publication. The double-blind peer review process ensures the integrity of the content published in the journal by avoiding any potential conflicts of interest. The reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and adhere to the journal's ethical standards.

In general, the double-blind peer review process is an effective and reliable way to ensure high standards of quality, rigor, and transparency in scholarly publishing. It helps the journal to publish original research and critical essays of the highest caliber. The journal's policy on double-blind peer review helps to maintain confidentiality and integrity while providing constructive feedback on the manuscripts.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The editorial board of "Literary Musings" is committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards in all aspects of our publication process. As such, we adhere to the principles and guidelines outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

To minimize the potential for conflicts of interest, all members of our editorial team, including editors, reviewers, and authors, are required to disclose any financial or personal relationships that may influence their work. This includes, but is not limited to, funding sources, affiliations with organizations or institutions, and personal relationships.

In the event that a conflict of interest is identified, the editorial board will take appropriate action to address the situation, which may include reassigning editorial responsibilities, seeking alternative reviewers, or delaying publication.

We believe that transparency and ethical conduct are essential to the integrity of our publication, and we are committed to upholding these values in every aspect of our work.

Publication Ethics for Authors, Reviewers and Editors

1. For Authors:

• All submitted works must be original and not previously published or under review elsewhere.

• Ensure that all data and sources used in the article are properly cited and acknowledged.

• Avoid plagiarism, fabrication, or falsification of research data.

• Describe the research methodology and provide accurate and verifiable results.

• Disclose any potential conflicts of interest or funding sources that might influence the study's outcome.

• Obtain permission from any material or content, including images or media, used in the article.

2. For Reviewers:

• Conduct an impartial and critical analysis of the manuscript, focusing on the quality and validity of the research.

• Ensure confidentiality and refrain from disclosing or using the manuscript for personal gain.

• Disclose any potential conflicts of interest or relationship with the author(s) or institution(s).

• Provide constructive and timely feedback to improve the manuscript's clarity and presentation.

• Alert the editor if any inaccuracies, ethical or legal issues, or copyright infringement concerns are found.

3. For Editors:

• Appoint independent and expert reviewers who have the necessary knowledge and experience to evaluate the manuscript.

• Ensure confidentiality and anonymity of the peer-review process, and only share the manuscript with relevant parties.

• Establish and maintain clear and transparent communication with authors and reviewers through editorial policies and guidelines.

• Address any potential ethical concerns or violations in a consistent and fair manner.

• Make editorial decisions based on the quality and relevance of the manuscript, not the author's reputation, credentials, or personal beliefs.

Steps against misconduct for Editors and Reviewers

1. Clearly define and communicate expectations for ethical conduct to all staff members, including editors, reviewers, authors, and publishers.

2. Implement a code of conduct or ethics policy for everyone involved in the publication process of Literary Musings, which includes expectations for the types of conduct that are considered unacceptable.

3. Establish a process for dealing with allegations of misconduct, such as plagiarism, falsification of data, or unethical behavior.

4. Develop a system for safely storing research data, manuscripts, and bibliographic references - ensuring data protection measures are in place to prevent data breaches that could compromise the authenticity or accuracy of published research.

5. Create a process for addressing authorship issues, such as disputes, incorrect or incomplete author affiliations, and author misrepresentations.

6. Ensure that all publication decisions of Literary Musings are transparent, objective, and unbiased - this means taking extra care to avoid conflicts of interest.

7. Set up a mechanism for reviewers and authors to raise concerns of potential misconduct without fearing retribution, to ensure that all cases of misconduct are addressed as they emerge.

8. Investigate all allegations of misconduct swiftly, conducting a rigorous investigation process that follows best practice and COPE ethical guidelines - this may involve interviews with relevant parties, comparing content, data or bibliographic references to pre-existing evidence, rechecking relevant data or conducting a forensic analysis of suspect materials.

9. When misconduct is determined, take appropriate actions that are consistent with the severity of the case. This may include retraction, correction, or revision of published materials, cancelling published publications, investigations into sources of misconduct, or removing members who engage in misconduct from the editorial board/local committee.

10. Provide support and resources to all members of the publication to ensure they feel confident to report emerging misconduct, and are aware of best ethical practice. Provide relevant training opportunities so everyone knows how to identify and respond to cases of misconduct, verifying data and validating research.

Article submission check list

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) is an organization providing guidelines and standard practices for academic publications. It aims to promote ethical conduct in publishing research and scientific literature. Journal editors adhere to COPE's best practices to ensure high-quality publications and avoid issues of plagiarism and misconduct.

If you are submitting an article to the academic journal "Literary Musings," here is a checklist that you should follow, taking guidance from the COPE ethics committee:

1. Originality of work: Ensure that the work you intend to submit is original and has not been published elsewhere, nor is it under consideration by another journal. Submitting duplicate work is unethical and can lead to serious repercussions.

2. Authorship: All authors who have made a significant contribution to the research must be listed as authors, and those who have not contributed substantially should not be listed as authors. Also, prior to submission, ensure that all authors have agreed to the publication and have provided their consent.

3. Plagiarism and Citation: Ensure that the work is free from any form of plagiarism. Give appropriate credit through citations to the original sources used to build upon the work, which helps to avoid issues of misconduct.

4. Abstract: Provide a concise and clear abstract that highlights the key findings and significance of the research.

5. Methodology: Provide a detailed and complete description of the research methodology. This aids in the reproduction or replication of the study by other scholars for purposes of verification or critique.

6. Figures and Tables: Ensure that all figures and tables are appropriately cited or referenced in the main text with proper legends and captions. They must be of adequate resolution and quality and free from any errors.

7. Ethical Considerations: Ethical considerations must be appropriately considered, especially for research involving human subjects or animals.

8. Acknowledgment: Provide appropriate acknowledgment to funders or contributors who have aided in the research work.

9. Conclusion and Implications: Clearly mention the conclusions and implications of the research. Also, highlight the potential applications and limitations of the findings.

10. Compliance with Journal Guidelines: Ensure that the submission complies with "Literary Musings" journal guidelines and format requirements. Failure to adhere to these guidelines may lead to a rejection of the submission.

In conclusion, following this COPE-guided checklist can help to enhance the quality of research submitted to journals like Literary Musings. It is essential to remember that ethical publishing practices are critical to maintaining the integrity, transparency, and credibility of academic literature.

Indexing and Abstracting and Preservation of Contents

"Literary Musings" is a scholarly journal that publishes articles and research in the field of literature. As an indexing and abstracting statement for this journal, we could say that each issue of "Literary Musings" includes a wide range of articles on various literary topics. The journal covers literature from different time periods and genres, including poetry, fiction, and drama.

To ensure that readers can easily find relevant articles, each issue of "Literary Musings" is carefully indexed using a range of relevant terms and concepts. This indexing helps readers quickly locate articles on specific topics or authors.

Additionally, each article in "Literary Musings" includes a concise and informative abstract. These abstracts summarize the key points of the article and give readers a sense of its content and scope. This makes it easier for readers to determine if an article is relevant to their research or interests.

Overall, "Literary Musings" is a valuable resource for scholars and students of literature. Its careful indexing and informative abstracts make it easy to find and access relevant articles on a wide range of literary topics.

Indexing: Google Scholar, Internet Archive, ISSN, ROAD, MLA, etc.

Content Registration in Crossref and Preservation in Internet Archive

We are proud to announce that all of our journal articles are registered with a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) with Crossref. This means that each article is assigned a unique and permanent identifier that makes it easy to locate and cite. The DOI also ensures that our articles are discoverable and accessible online for the long-term.

In addition to DOI registration, our journal articles are also preserved for long-term access, preservation and availability through the Internet Archive. This is a digital library that provides free access to millions of books, websites, and other resources. By preserving our articles in the Internet Archive, we are ensuring that they are available for future generations of scholars and researchers.

Overall, our commitment to Crossref DOI registration and long-term preservation through the Internet Archive reflects our dedication to providing high-quality, accessible, and enduring scholarly content. We believe that these measures will help to ensure the long-term viability and impact of our journal.